Hi, we're Hunter and Sarah, a husband-and-wife, luxury wedding photography team. We’re also educators, helping other photographers build profitable and sustainable photography businesses.
—
Last week, we continued our Camera Bag Essentials blog series with a discussion on the best prime lens. This week, we’re continuing with the next piece of glass that Hunter and I purchased in the early days of our wedding photography side-hustle: a wide-angle lens.
But between the 35 mm prime, the 24-70 mm f/2.8 zoom, and the ultra-wide 14-24 mm f/2.8 zoom, which one is right for you and your business? Read on and find out!
Even if you just shoot portraits, you’ll find pretty quickly that only owning a 50 mm or an 85 mm prime lens can be somewhat limiting. Sometimes you want to really capture the context that your subjects are in, going for a wide portrait shot.
But especially if you want to shoot weddings, there are a ton of situations where you’ll need a wider lens. From the getting ready suite to the ceremony, and for all sorts of large group portraits!
We’ll start with the 35 mm prime lens, since it’s the least expensive lens out of the three. If you read our blog last week, you know that we don’t necessarily recommend a 35 mm as your first and only prime lens. However, if you just want a wider angle for portrait work, it’s a great option!
Another area where Hunter LOVES his 35 mm lens is during dancing photos! He really loves to get right up in the thick of the dance floor for dancing photos, so the lightweight and fast-focusing 35 mm prime lens is perfect for both close-up dancing photos, and wider ones!
However, if you’re going to be shooting weddings and so far only own a prime lens, like the 50 mm or 85 mm, we don’t think that a 35 mm should be your next purchase. And no, we promise we don’t hate the 35 mm, we’re just pragmatists 😂
Why do we think that? Well, it all comes down to the fixed focal length. Because the 35 mm can’t zoom, it’s definitely possible to find yourself in a situation where your back is literally against the wall, you can’t back up any more, but you still can’t fit your subjects in the frame. Sometimes, it just isn’t wide enough.
Another thing to think about with any wide angle lens, is the lens distortion that happens around the edges of the frame. If you put anyone or anything in the 15% of the frame closest to the edge, they can start to look like you took their photo in a fun-house mirror. And because the 35 mm just isn’t very wide, it’s more likely that you find yourself in a situation where you end up putting your subjects too close to the edge.
The lens that we would recommend as the second purchase for any aspiring wedding photographer would be the 24-70 mm f/2.8 (or the f/4.0 if you can’t possibly save up for the f/2.8 before your first few weddings). There’s a reason that a 24-70 is an absolutely standard of most professional photographer’s camera bags. It’s incredibly versatile!
For starters, the extra coverage you get between 35 mm and 24 mm might not seem like much, but can make all the difference in the world when shooting in tight indoor spaces!
Also, the ability to zoom in and out quickly and without moving our feet is essential during certain parts of the day (like when the wedding party is walking down the aisle) and convenient during almost all of the day (like switching from large group family photos to tighter, smaller-group photos).
Plus, on top of these two important advantages, you can still use it just as effectively for wide-angle portraits, flat-lay details, large wedding parties, dancing photos, and family portraits. And as you shoot these things, you’re less likely to get the wide-angle lens distortion we talked about with the 35 mm, since you have the ability to zoom further out, and are therefore less likely to be forced to put your subject in the edge of the frame.
Something you might be wondering at this point is, “What about the zoom lens that my camera came with? That’s a wide angle zoom, isn’t it?” And while you’d be technically correct, that “kit lens”, or the lens your camera came with, isn’t a professional lens, and has a variable, more closed-down aperture.
So if you’re zoomed all the way out, it’s likely at f/3.5, and if you’re zoomed in, it’s at f/5.6. Compare that to a high-end 24-70 mm which will stay at f/2.8 whether you’re zoomed in or out. And like we mentioned last week, lower aperture numbers give you blurry backgrounds and allow your subjects to pop, and they’re also helpful in low-light situations!
However, we also understand that forking over $2,000+ for a new 24-70 mm f/2.8 isn’t possible for many newer photographers. If that’s you, but you still want your hands on this nice lens, you have 3 options: you can settle for a less-professional (but still nicer than your kit lens) zoom lens, like the 24-70 mm f/4.0, which will run you less than half of it’s f/2.8 counterpart.
Another option would be to find a used lens in great shape and save some money there. Finally, you could do some research, and go for a third-party lens like Tamron. A word of caution here though: you often “get what you pay for” when it comes to lenses. So if you’re getting a $2,300 lens for only $500, there’s probably a reason.
When we were first getting started, we purchased all of our zoom lenses from Tamron. We had done some research and found that — at the time — the Tamron 24-70 mm (as well as the 70-200 mm, more on that next week) were about 90% as good as their Nikon equivalents for around half the cost. So we thought that that made the most sense for our business at the time!
Now, the last lens we want to talk about when discussing wide-angle lenses is an ultra-wide lens. We own Nikon’s Z-mount 14-24 mm f/2.8 lens, but there are several different iterations of the professional ultra-wide lens. Before we switched to mirrorless, we owned a cheaper, variable aperture Tamron 17-35 mm. It got the job done, but we were frustrated that — because of the variable aperture — our settings would change as we zoomed in and out.
This lens is definitely not a “must-have” lens, but when DO you have the budget to afford a nice ultra-wide, it will save you in the rare extremely tight spaces. There’s a high-end wedding venue here in Charlottesville that is absolutely gorgeous in many respects, but the getting ready suite that they give to couples who book with them is absolutely tiny.
So in these rare cases, I’ll break out the 14-24, and capture a photo like the one below on the left. There’s just no way to get an image like this in this space with anything other than an ultra-wide! Of course, I’m also shooting with my 50 mm prime during these times, capturing images like this one on the right, but it’s nice to have an option that can still provide more context for that specific moment in the day.
So, in summary, all three of these lenses are great, but are best in different situations.
Click HERE to get your free copy of our eBook: “5 Essential Tips for Turning your Side-Hustle into a Full-Time Photography Business.” You’ll also be subscribed to our newsletter, so our newest content, weekly encouragement, and exclusive offers will be delivered right to your inbox!
—
If you’re planning to purchase anything that we talked about today and we helped you make your decision, it would mean SO much to us if you purchased it through the links below! You’ll pay the same price as you normally would on Amazon, but Amazon would share a small slice of the profit with us. You’ll get what you need, support a small local business (us), and show us that our advice really has been helpful! Thanks! [Prices shown as of date of publishing, and are just for comparison/reference]
For Mirrorless Z Cameras:
For DSLR Cameras:
—
Filed in:
Wedding Photography & Photography Education
Charlottesville, Virginia and Beyond
e. hunter@hunterandsarahphotography.com
p. (434) 260-0902
Once you enter your contact info below, you'll receive an email within minutes with a link to our free guide! You'll also be subscribed to our For-Photographers newsletter!